everything sounds so good, it is almost hard to believe it. The general public out there believes that we are applying the same rules to our own institution as we apply to them. That is not true. That is not true. In the Americans With Disabilities Act, for instance, we excluded title II. We hear this rhetoric that we put that in. We excluded title II. Title II is buildings and transportation. You wait until we have to change the other subway. That is fine, but the last one cost $16 million. I wonder what the others are going to cost. That is not coming out of my pocket or the Senator's pocket; it is coming out of the taxpayer's pocket. The congressional exemptions in the statutes as provided by this bill will do a lot of things. If the same laws are applied to Congress as to the private sector, the statutory provisions must be the same. The statutory provisions are not the same. The remedies available to employees must be the same, the regulations must be the same, and the provisions for judicial enforcement and review must be the same as it applies to the private sector. But, no, we do not do that. We do not do that. No, we do not. The Republican bill creates a special agency, creates a special agency, to enforce selective provisions of law to the Congress.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the discrepancies in how laws apply to Congress versus the private sector.
Share
More from Gerald Ford
I know the gentleman made the point about the Democratic Party, but was not the gentleman quoted in the front page of one of our local newspapers here on the Hill urging us not to consider a telecom bill because it would hurt campaign…
just for the gentleman from Florida, you are saying that these cuts that are being talked about today are imaginary, or are they real? And I would be happy to yield to the gentleman. Are they imaginary cuts or real cuts? Maybe we have got…
Folks who are enjoying part of this tax credit today, in 2005 will see that tax cut decrease or eliminated all together. Which, if I understand the definition of a tax increase, that indeed is a tax increase on people earning $11,000 a…
So, Mr. Speaker, so if millionaires took a $65,000 tax cut as opposed to a $103,000 tax cut, we could pay for the student loan program.





