when we start debating tax legislation on the floor, I hope our debate will be governed by a few basic principles. Let me state those questions which are most important to me personally. Each of these questions needs a satisfactory answer. Are the tax benefits spread evenly across all income levels? Is the tax legislation consistent with the budget agreement? Does the tax package undermine a balanced budget after 10 years? We need answers which meet basic standards of fairness and sound public policy. These are the standards I think we should use to judge any tax bill that comes to this floor. Today, I would like to talk a little more about the first concern I have mentioned how evenly the benefits of the proposed tax bills will fall across income levels. A distribution table put out by the Senate Finance Committee claims that 74 percent of the tax benefits in the proposal pending before that Committee go to those making under $75,000; 74 percent. That sounds pretty good. On the other hand, our analysis shows that 43 percent of the benefits go to the wealthiest 10 percent, and two-thirds of the benefits go to the top 20 percent.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing principles for evaluating tax legislation during a floor debate.
Share
More from Gerald Ford
the picture is clear: our airlines and airports simply lack the capacity and funding to fulfill this vital police function. We have heard it from all of our colleagues at Louis Armstrong Airport where a man boarded a plane with a gun…
President Reagan led the nation with resolve and courage. He showed these same qualities in his battle against Alzheimer's disease. President Reagan will be remembered for many things--a great communicator, devoted husband and an…
so much has been said about the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Clay). Not enough can be said. I have happened to have the chance to know him or he has known me all of my life. My dad was his colleague in Congress for more than 22 years…
If my reading is correct, and I have not been a part of any of the meetings, it appeared to me that one of the reasons that the tax cut was reduced from $726 billion to $550 billion to $350 billion was because there was disagreement in the…





