No. It is my understanding that when you related to figures that you reduced the amount of reduction using $135 billion, that the White House on December 15th moved toward your figures--moved toward your figures on discretionary, moved toward your figures on Medicare, moved towards your figures on Medicaid, did not move toward your figures on earned income tax credit--you did come down $12 billion on that over the 7 years. I kind of thought that both sides were beginning to work together.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget negotiations and figures related to reductions in spending.
Share
More from Gerald Ford
I know the gentleman made the point about the Democratic Party, but was not the gentleman quoted in the front page of one of our local newspapers here on the Hill urging us not to consider a telecom bill because it would hurt campaign…
President Reagan led the nation with resolve and courage. He showed these same qualities in his battle against Alzheimer's disease. President Reagan will be remembered for many things--a great communicator, devoted husband and an…
I have heard all the debate and I am curious. To my friend Mr. Putnam, the President just left Nashville, and out of curiosity does the President know that you all are introducing this after what he said last night? The SPEAKER pro…
will the gentleman put up the chart that was up earlier showing Clintonomics versus the last chart and agree that perhaps spending grew in those years because revenue for the government grew as well, and perhaps that President and this…





