I am proud to be labeled as the deficit hawk because I know that deficits are harmful to our economic growth and our future prosperity. All of us in this body are heartened by the recent news that the deficit in fact is coming down. Who would have guessed the deficit this year could have been as low perhaps as $50 billion? I once worked at the Office of Management and Budget. I watched a Congress that back in the 1980's promised to cut taxes and cut spending. They only did one: cut taxes, did not cut spending. We saw the deficit balloon by trillions of dollars, of which we are paying almost some $300 billion in interest just this year. Our country has always been based on checks and balances. That is what this bill does. If we do not hit the deficit target, we will not see the tax cuts come into play. We need this measure as some version of an accountability so that we can reach a balanced budget. We will not see our deficits increasing the debt. I would urge all of my colleagues to vote for this.
On the recordJuly 23, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a bill aimed at reducing the deficit and ensuring fiscal accountability.
Share
More from Fred Upton
Jun 12, 2024
Well, he's on the tap lift, the short five, I guess you could call it. I don't think the things that he said back in 2016, maybe 2017 really matter much. He's a MAGA Republican.
Nov 7, 2021
It's going to ultimately -- Mr. Garland has as a big say here in terms of how this thing proceeds.
Jul 19, 2021
Mike Enzi, chairman of the Budget Committee over there in the Senate, said you got to pay for it.
Dec 14, 2021
I do rise in opposition to both the rule and the previous question so the House can consider H.R. 6235, the Strategic Production Response Act, introduced by the top Republican on the Energy and Commerce Committee, Mrs. Cathy McMorris…





