I rise in support of the Klug amendment to privatize the Department of Energy laboratories. Congressman Klug's amendment would privatize the DOE laboratories, encouraging private sector innovation and competitiveness, much like we did in the dismantling of the Department of Commerce act, H.R. 1756. By privatizing the laboratory functions of the DOE, we will encourage these newly privatized entities to produce and sell their services more widely. By removing the nonessential research and development functions and the means of production from the Federal Government labs, we will now produce on the basis of demand, and in turn spin off other industries, creating jobs and providing increased revenues for the Nation. Speaking from firsthand experience, the private sector entities have always proved to be more efficient and accountable, and if they are not, they would go out of business. Federal programs, on the other hand, such as the DOE labs, are simply not held to the degree of accountability that private sector labs are. Instead of going out of business, as would be the case in the private sector, Congress merely passes the cost on to the taxpayers.
Dick Chrysler: “I rise in support of the Klug amendment to privatize the Department of Energy laboratories. Congressman Klug's amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Klug amendment to privatize the Department of Energy laboratories.
Share
More from Dick Chrysler
Obviously, Mr. Speaker, when people borrow money they are expected to pay it back. Certainly when lawyers start lining their pockets based on technicalities to keep people from having to pay those funds back, then it is time for the…
within the Violence Against Women Act programs is a special program that is very dear to me and the people of the eighth District of Michigan. I am referring to the battered women's shelter programs administered through the Department of…
we voted last year, I would say to my colleague, the gentleman from Michigan, just last year we voted on the Barton amendment that had a two-thirds provision in it in the balanced budget amendment. Then we did, in fact, vote to have this…
we hear a lot in this debate today about the election year ploy and the campaign ploy of this two-thirds majority. There are some short memories in this body, because it was just last year that we voted on this very issue in this same…





