I would say impeachment could be a possibility there. I do believe as you read the Constitution, the operative phrase, the operative theme, as we try to determine and decipher exactly what the intent of our Founding Fathers was, is that every Member of this House needs to be directly elected by the people. While I appreciate the gentleman's insistence on a constitutional amendment, it is obviously well thought out, the gentleman feels very passionately about it, I could not disagree more strongly.
Candice S. Miller: “I would say impeachment could be a possibility there. I do believe as you read the Constitution, the operative phrase…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of constitutional amendments and impeachment.
Share
More from Candice S. Miller
I am sure it has always been there, but it seems to have gotten worse over time. And what is happening to Miguel Estrada is a very vivid demonstration of political gridlock and it must be stopped. It has to be spoken out against, and I am…
I am going to be offering the motion to recommit momentarily, which will be offering to restore the tax credit for car purchases to the full $11.5 billion, which was reported by the Senate to the conference committee. Unfortunately, it was…
I am not an expert in this part of the law, but I do believe Federalist Paper No. 47 addresses principally the gentleman's argument there. I will tell you though, as I mentioned, I was the Secretary of State for 8 years in one of our…
I feel very, very strongly, a vast majority, a bipartisan majority of this House feel that all of us should be directly elected by the people. I think the bill we passed previously does address that in a realistic way.





