the only thing worse than nuclear weapons is not having them and have other people have them and use them
A tidal wave of death is what we're talking about.
As long as those nuclear weapons exist, we need to maintain a capability to deter their possible use against the United States or our friend...
Is there a timeline and a price tag on the overall nuclear modernization project?
I wonder if it isn't time to stop and say, do we need a new strategy other than trying to just kill our enemies as they arise?
One of the common questions I get in Maine, people are all concerned about the deficit and the debt that we're leaving our children.
But, I think it would be helpful for us to see the overall picture of what it is that we're biting off, here.
Directed energy would be a lot cheaper, if it works, than sending a rocket up every time.
Isn't it true that in order to go to the 5,500, which is a fundamental change of mission?
Bingo.
Any military leader would want to keep all the advantage to him, not provide any advantage to the enemy.