I don't understand calling somebody an ally who's--and having them produce these death-dealing substances.
Does deterrence work with North Korea? Are they concerned about the possibility of being obliterated if they attack?
As they say, it would behoove us to let there be no misunderstanding.
I would agree with them that they do need more icebreaker, more capacity and capability out there.
Deterrence is complex, and it requires a deep understanding of the adversary.
So, I would urge you, with counsels of the administration, to push for a sense of urgency on this question.
When are we going to have a well-developed and articulated cyberdeterrence strategy?
But, I take it you agree that we should move--Cyber Command should be its own combatant command.
It's not deterrence if it's not articulated.
We cannot keep going for these very perfect weapon systems that everybody has a piece of.
We have got to get back into the business of communications, it seems to me.