I come here and I watch episodes like we just observed and it is really interesting. I guess my question to you is a rhetorical question. Why cannot folks on the other side simply debate with respect to facts? Why can they not say, look, Ehrlich, look at you Republicans, Medicare should increase 10 percent a year. If it grows 7 percent a year, it is not good enough. At least they would be intellectually honest. We could have a real give and take. I suspect the fact you were not allowed into the conversation, no time was yielded to you, was they know that is the case. They know a 7-percent increase per year, as the Republican budget proposal proposed, is no cut. But look at the terminology, look at the words they use.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nature of political debate and facts in Congress compared to state legislature experiences.
Share
More from Robert Ehrlich
3 weeks ago the Federal Government finally got around to using the services of the National Credit Management Corp. of Hunt Valley, MD, a company located in my congressional district. Under the terms of the contract, NCMC would send…
The gentleman just used the term ``fear'' twice in the last minute. That is a great lead-in to category 2, issue 2, standing up for families and seniors. ``Ehrlich voted to slash Medicare and Medicaid,'' my personal favorite whopper from…
It is a pleasure being with everybody. Demagogues hate facts, but truth usually wins out.
One thing that I feel very positive about as a result of our trip and something that I intend to talk about a lot, on many occasions during my visits to schools, is the relationship between young American men and women being put in harm's…





