It is my solemn responsibility this morning to present for your consideration House Resolution 755 and the accompanying House Judiciary Committee report concerning the impeachment of Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for…
Jamie Raskin
The Public Record
Jamie Raskin is an American attorney, law professor, and politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Maryland's 8th congressional district since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, Raskin has been an advocate for various progressive policies, including healthcare reform and civil rights. He gained national attention for his role in the impeachment proceedings against former President Donald Trump, where he served as a lead impeachment manager during the Senate trial in early 2020.
There is an overwhelming and uncontradicted body of evidence that the President did that.
70 percent of the American people believe that the President has done something wrong in these actions of trying to pressure a foreign government to get involved in our election.
He didn't care about the Russian war on the people of Ukraine. He didn't care about corruption.
He wanted a statement on television that Ukraine was investigating and was going to investigate Vice President Joe Biden.
Zelensky loves your ass, and you are going to get exactly what you want from him.
Article I of the Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power of impeachment.
The President doesn't give a blank about Ukraine. He is interested in the big stuff, and what is the big stuff? Whatever can benefit him.
Today, we bring our fellow citizens overwhelming and totally uncontradicted evidence of two high crimes and misdemeanors against the American people.
The House had no choice but to impeach, because, under our Constitution, the President's job is to take care that the laws are faithfully executed.
No actions were taken against any of the officials involved in this substantiated retaliation.
OK. And did this retaliation that you found violate the Military Whistleblower Protection Act?
So, if you think of it like a report card you would see a row of sixes, then she makes her complaint, and then it drops down to three.
And do you feel that it was not designed to accomplish an accurate assessment of what actually took place?
His commitment to ensuring the Coast Guard and the Coast Guard Academy did the best job possible, exemplified the highest values.
I want to, in many ways, join Mr. Roy in commending the Coast Guard for a great job they do.
Significant improvements to policies and procedures are needed to ensure full and consistent enforcement of anti-harassment and hate incident policies.
The Coast Guard military leadership failed to conduct prompt, thorough, and impartial investigations of allegations of harassment and bullying.
We should not tolerate a single act of bullying or harassment against a member of any branch of our armed services.
When we passed the MGT Act that both Mr. Meadows and I also sponsored, it was to be able to allow reinvestment in the enterprise through the savings effectuated through implementation of FITARA.





