Jamie Raskin

Pat Cipollone is a material witness. He has a huge volume of relevant evidence. And he was there at every level of each of these assaults on democracy and the rule of law.

The committee is well aware that witness tampering is a federal offense.

Witness tampering is a federal offense. It is an offense in the District of Columbia. It`s an offense in all of the states.

If there is substantial factual predicate for obstruction of justice or witness tampering, we will take appropriate legal measures at that point.

The Federal Government can certainly, and Congress can, of course, provide the resources that are needed for communities.

Harm reduction policies, as me, as a provider and a local health physician, I can tell you is all about building community trust.

Addiction is a terrible brain disease as you have described it, and I believe the administration has adopted an approach called harm reduction

The courageous acts of a lot of strong constitutional patriots along the line that prevented a whole series of plots from succeeding.

The Department of Justice which people like to think of as a paragon of legal neutrality and objective decision-making suddenly being saturated by these outrageous political demands by the president of the United States.

There's so much more passion for democracy in the country than there is support for insurrection and coups.

The idea that the only vulnerable people are the ones living in nursing homes is ridiculous, is it not?

I would like to ask unanimous consent to introduce this excellent staff report called 'The Atlas Dogma: The Trump Administration's Embrace of a Dangerous and Discredited Herd Immunity Via Mass Infection Strategy.'

We have lost more than 1 million Americans, and had the scientific advice been heeded by the Administration how many people might we have saved?

I think that they believed the counterfactual points that were never supported by data, from Dr. Atlas and his team.

Do you think that there is any connection between these two things, that he wanted to listen to the people who were telling him, like Dr. Atlas, just to let COVID-19 run wild?

But you just testified a moment ago that the President failed to act on it because they were interested in the politics of trying to, well, win the election first.

The January 6 Committee has determined that Donald Trump has knowingly, deliberately lied--it is obvious from all of the evidence--about who won the Presidential election.

I just wanted it to be the Twilight Zone and all go away.

Would you agree with me, Doctor, that a critical ingredient to a successful public health strategy is social cohesion?

I don't see the President so I don't have a counterbalance opportunity to this Atlas dogma.

I want to thank you first for your service in the White House, operating in the face of a lot of propaganda and a lot of obfuscation.

Deluge of new evidence.

Why wasn't redaction sufficient to protect the anonymity of the women being interviewed in the case of the Washington team when it was sufficient in the case of the Dolphins?

I'm puzzled by this, too: Why would you pay hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to investigate sexual harassment in a toxic workplace environment, but then publish no written report about it?

How is that protecting the privacy and confidentiality of the women, which you've asserted is your key value here?