Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 20, 2025
Madam President, I call up my amendment No. 233 and ask that it be reported by number. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the amendment by number. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Maryland [Mr. Van Hollen], for himself and Ms. Hirono, proposes an amendment numbered 233. The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To create a point of order against legislation that would cut funding from the school lunch or school breakfast programs) At the appropriate place in title IV, add the following: SEC. 4___. POINT OF ORDER AGAINST LEGISLATION THAT WOULD CUT FUNDING FROM THE SCHOOL LUNCH OR SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAMS. (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment between the Houses, or conference report that cuts funding from the school lunch program under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) or the school breakfast program established under section 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773). (b) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (a) may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three- fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under subsection (a).
Said by
Chris Van Hollen
Democratic · Maryland

Share & report

More from Chris Van Hollen

May 8, 2025

Mr. President, I rise in strong opposition to today's resolution to overturn an FCC rule that provides greater flexibility to ensure that every student has the access to the internet that they need. We have known for a long time that…

govinfo.gov
Jul 19, 2025

I just don’t think he’s going to get away with it fully.

breitbart.com
Jul 19, 2025

The Trump administration has made everybody wonder what it is they’re trying to hide.

breitbart.com
Jul 27, 2025

Well, the United States should make very clear that it's unacceptable to use U.S. weapons to target or indiscriminately fire on civilians and civilian infrastructure.

cbsnews.com

Other voices in this conversation