In all of his research on the bill, has he not found that this is a very compelling issue for women and for children, that there has essentially been a ``moat'' around access to medical treatment and, therefore, leaving it to the Senate or legislative bodies to make corrections, one procedure at a time, like drive-by deliveries, dumping of mastectomy patients? Would it not be better to take down the ``moat'' around medical treatment and do this in a comprehensive way, especially a way that it affects the women and children?
Barbara Mikulski: “In all of his research on the bill, has he not found that this is a very compelling issue for women and for children…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the Democratic leader about the impact of medical treatment access on women and children.
Share
More from Barbara Mikulski
It will be a proud day for our country when every girl who visits the National Mall is able to see herself represented amongst the giants of our national story.
Your leadership in placing the Women's Suffrage National Monument on the National Mall will expand our Nation's understanding of American women's leadership.
As the longest serving woman in congressional history, I proudly stand on the shoulders of the suffragists who fought bravely and boldly for generations to secure women's political equality.
Of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, is it the desire of the other party to be doing, like, a colloquy--an extensive colloquy--dealing with the Veterans First Act? I am trying to get the lay of the land here on the floor, because the…





