The region needs a strong commitment from the United States to push back Iran's actions in Iraq, in Syria, and elsewhere.
John Kerry
The Public Record
John Kerry is a prominent Democratic politician from Massachusetts who served as the 68th Secretary of State from February 2013 to January 2017 under President Barack Obama. Prior to his role as Secretary of State, Kerry was a United States Senator, representing Massachusetts from January 1985 until June 2013. During his time in the Senate, he was known for his work on foreign relations, environmental issues, and healthcare reform. He played a significant role in the negotiation of the Paris Agreement on climate change, emphasizing the importance of international cooperation in addressing global challenges.
I agree with the formulation that Senator Kaine put forward, that Iran--that the sanctions were effective, certainly in debilitating their economy, but it did not do much to slow their drive toward a nuclear weapon.
One question that I think is on the minds of a lot of people is whether this deal will lead our regional allies to decide that they, too, should pursue a nuclear weapons program.
In my view, if the arrangements currently being negotiated for inspection and monitoring, together with the mechanisms for reimposing sanctions, should the Iranians be caught cheating, if those are robust enough to deter and detect Iranian…
It is time for the defensive strategy we and our international partners have pursued thus far to transition to an offensive strategy.
President Obama deserves credit for having made the decision, which I think was key, that he was not going to move until they began to make the moves to put a government change in place.
The President has made it clear it is not his policy. And I have never seen anybody more adamant about that.
We ask you now to work closely with us on a bipartisan basis to develop language that provides a clear signal of support for our ongoing military operations against ISIL.
The mission was going to be without troops, without ground forces. It was designed that way.
No. I think the President feels that he has the full authority, both constitutionally and through the current AUMF.
I think that your statement was incorrect, and you know, everybody is accountable for what they say, and so are you.
Meanwhile, our Syrian rebels honestly do not understand why you will not protect them from Bashar's intense bombing campaign.
ISIS terrorists are not going to simply go away. We cannot ignore them and hope that they will embrace our values.
But as President of the United States, he also believes that his constitutional authority is vital and his ability as Commander in Chief to fully empower his military to be able to effect what he needs should not be micromanaged.
We all have decided we have got to defeat these guys. Everybody is agreed that we have to degrade and defeat ISIL.
What do your enemies do in the meantime? What do our allies do in the meantime?
I also think that there is a very compelling reason for Congress to act and to express itself, as Senator Kaine has said, months after we already sent sons and daughters of America into harm's way.
The President acknowledges, as any President would, as all of our military would, ask any of the people who are being asked to implement this strategy whether they feel comfortable knowing that they have been limited.
I support the conduct of this conflict against ISIL, that I think they are a real and present threat to the United States and our allies in the region.
Yes, there is a great deal of effort to try to expedite at this point in time.





