The chemical weapons attack against innocent civilians in Syria is an indirect attack on America's security, with broader implications for the region and the world.
Are we willing to watch a slaughter just because the patrons of that slaughter are willing to use their veto at the Unit...
The question is, will we send a message that the United States will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons anywhere in...
We are at a crossroads moment. A precedent will be set either for the unfettered and unpunished use of chemical weapons,...
Forcing Assad to change his calculation about his ability to act with impunity can contribute to his realization that he...
Our silence would embolden Kim Jong-un, who has a large chemical weapons cache, and would send a message that we are not...
The decision rests with us. It is not political. It is a policy decision that must be based, I believe, on what we belie...
What we do in the face of the chemical attack by the Assad regime against innocent civilians will send a signal to the w...
We will either send a message to Syria, Iran, North Korea, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, and any other nonstate actors that the w...
The message is that he has been granted impunity, the freedom to choose to use the weapons again or force us to go throu...
When someone kills and injures hundreds of children with a weapon the world has banned, we are all responsible.