So this is some really sensitive information, and it is supposed to be voluntary to hand it over.

I do not understand how that connects, then, with the rules on discrimination. It sounds a lot like discrimination.

Telling people it will cost you $1,500 if you do not reveal very sensitive medical information, I think, stretches the bounds of what constitutes voluntary.

I believe there is work to be done. Yes, ma'am.

I have to say when you charge differentially, $1,500 or sometimes more, and that can happen because people do not want to reveal very sensitive, personal medical information.

The law says five, 5 years of exclusivity, but drug companies game the system.

The credit reporting agency is a threat to each of us personally, but it is also a threat to our national security.

I have introduced the FREE Act with Senator Schatz and more than a dozen other Senators.

How about the Federal Government competing and actually having some competition and saying, 'We're going to negotiate prices.'

The high cost of prescription drugs is a huge problem. Let's talk about the best way to tackle this public health crisis.

consumers should be able to control their own data, and without consumer control, credit reporting companies really have no reason to treat us well.

If companies like Equifax do not pay us to sell our information to other people, then we should not have to pay them to stop selling it.