I led a number of my colleagues in calling for more funding to support LEAD and other diversion programs like it.

But I think it is not just about how much money we spend, but how we spend that money.

President Trump's promises to treat the epidemic as a public health emergency won't get the job done unless there are also significant increases in federal funding.

I just want to underline that I think we need to be focused on not just the inputs, the number of ships or marines or aircraft, but also on the outputs, the goals we are trying to achieve with the force we have.

I think we need to consider that when we are looking at our capability gaps against China and Russia, in particular.

He pretended that he cared about people being able to get their healthcare coverage, and then he got confirmed, and spent 8 months doing everything he could to take away people's healthcare coverage, and crash the healthcare system.

Eli Lilly decided to boost its profits by pushing the drug on nursing homes for uses like dementia and Alzheimer's with no proof that it would work.

I just want to make it clear for the record. I asked the question about whether or not you think CEO's ought to be held accountable when the companies they are running break the law.

I do not think there was adequate accountability.

Do you agree that when a drug company lies about its products, or defrauds taxpayers, it should be held accountable by the Federal Government?

Do you think that CEO's, like John Lechleiter, should be held personally accountable when drug companies like Eli Lilly break the law?

this Administration has spent the first 11 months of this year trying every trick in the book to destroy the health insurance system in this country.