At the end of the day, we wind up being part of this with that wink and nod to this ultimately very dangerous technology that some day very well could come back to haunt the whole ...
By saying that we give permission for Norway to take our nuclear materials to France, we are just sending a dual message that would be hard ...
I do not agree that this agreement in any way encourages Norway to pursue such technology.
As you testified in March, reprocessing makes no financial sense, but it is not only economically unjustifiable, it is also dangerous.
I think we do. So I do not understand why, again, we would move to our nonproliferation policy as a solution for a private sector problem th...
Providing an alternative to avoid the reprocessing option, which has proliferation implications, and offering other alternatives, it seems t...
It always has been and it continues to be where we kind of preach temperance but from a bar stool, saying do not do it, but yet here, once a...
It is about a precedent that is set. It is about further momentum which is created towards a reprocessing world that ultimately increases th...
What concerns me is that by allowing Norway to export our spent nuclear fuel to other countries for reprocessing, we are as a country promot...
As Senator Markey has already noted, it has one clause that is not in every 123 agreement but that is far from unprecedented.
If reprocessing is economically unjustifiable and militarily dangerous, why should any agreement we sign provide advance consent to engage i...