I think it's important for the country that we not have a secretary of state who seems compromised or potentially compromised in a very, very serious situation.

I think they have a point. Look, is there an information pipeline to the White House from Republicans? Yes.

It has been central to the Republican defense that there was no quid pro quo. One more defense has been knocked down on the Republican side.

The next question to them will be, was it appropriate? And on that one, I don't think they can possibly say it was appropriate.

The counterargument is that the impeachment process is expressly laid out by the Constitution.

Zero members of his party broke. I think that's a really interesting, important distinction.

No president is above the law.

However this comes out. But I think that's what we're pointing toward.

The founders didn't want to do this very often.

This judge has taken a sledgehammer to the stonewall that the administration has tried to erect and maintain.

I think they'll do everything they can to stop him. His testimony is significant, Anderson, because Taylor had delivered this blockbuster testimony, but it's very much in conflict with Sondland.

I think it's important -- it would have been helpful to call witnesses of their own for their period of the process, when everything is secret.