If you have evidence that the President directed most of this, he directed Giuliani, he directed Mulvaney on - on, you know, on - on a variety of issues, if you have that kind of information, even though you may not have obvious intent or obvious evidence, isn't that persuasive--
David Gergen discusses the implications of evidence showing that President Trump directed actions involving Giuliani and Mulvaney.
Share
More from David Gergen
I think a lot of Americans do see it as disqualifying. And they're worried about it.
The midterms really helped him. They transformed the race, best midterm elections for any president in 20 years.
For Donald Trump to go for a 24-plus hours without a word being said is an outrage in and of itself. This is a man who is seeking the nomination of a major political party, very likely to get it. And now look at the leadership he is…
But I think, to go to David Urban's point, what was she calling about? Well, she was calling, she testified, because she thought there was fraud that had been committed, and had not yet been explored, and that it ought to be studied before…
Other voices in this conversation
