Yes. When you go to, say, the Opera Ball, I do not know what one of these dinners down here will cost. You go down at the hotel. I do not feel like I am really being entertained. I feel like I am doing when I go to those things at the Meridian House, the Opera Ball, the March of Dimes, what have you, I kind of feel like that is a contribution of time and effort to these things, and not something they are giving me. But if I had to pay $150 for something every time I went to those, most Senators except the wealthy ones will not go.
John Johnston: “Yes. When you go to, say, the Opera Ball, I do not know what one of these dinners down here will cost. You go down at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the costs associated with attending social events in Washington, D.C.
Share
More from John Johnston
It is my understanding of S. 1935 that it will be practically impossible for Members to make an effort, either directly or indirectly, to assist worthwhile causes--that is, tax-exempt, charitable entities.
Would the Senator not agree with me that when on page 36 it defines ``gift'' as including a charitable contribution made on the basis of a designation, recommendation, or other specification made to a lobbyist or foreign agent by a Member…
Is it not a fact that the Levin-Wellstone amendment allows the same thing, only while ours would be limited to $75, yours is unlimited, provided it is motivated by personal friendship, to be decided by the Member?
So in effect, any involvement with charities by Senators, whether it is sponsoring a charity, whether it is being the honoree of the charity, whether it is using your name on the stationery, or being on a sponsoring committee, All of that…





