Under section a(1), it provides that no Member or spouse may knowingly accept a gift provided directly or indirectly by lobbyists. And it goes on to say in subsection (c), that the following items are subject to the restrictions as contained in section a(1). It says, (c), a charitable contribution made on the basis of a designation, recommendation, or other specification made through a lobbyist by a Member. I think the Senator would agree with me that if a Senator signed a letter asking a lobbyist or asking people who happen to include lobbyists to contribute to the United Way, or to the United Negro College Fund or to the Sierra club, or whatever, that would be in violation.
John Johnston: “Under section a(1), it provides that no Member or spouse may knowingly accept a gift provided directly or indirectly by…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing ethical guidelines regarding gifts from lobbyists during Senate debate.
Share
More from John Johnston
So in effect, any involvement with charities by Senators, whether it is sponsoring a charity, whether it is being the honoree of the charity, whether it is using your name on the stationery, or being on a sponsoring committee, All of that…
The Senator just mentioned our bill allows for unlimited and undisclosed meals, et cetera, and listed four things dealing with meals, tickets and gifts.
Yes. When you go to, say, the Opera Ball, I do not know what one of these dinners down here will cost. You go down at the hotel. I do not feel like I am really being entertained. I feel like I am doing when I go to those things at the…
All I am saying, I think that is entirely correct, and ours allows that. The difference is ours is limited to $75, yours is unlimited, except yours is close personal friend. All I am saying is that the Senator from Minnesota, in quavering…





