Political Quotes

John Johnston: “Would the Senator not agree with me that when on page 36 it defines ``gift'' as including a charitable contribution made…”

On the recordMay 5, 1994
Would the Senator not agree with me that when on page 36 it defines ``gift'' as including a charitable contribution made on the basis of a designation, recommendation, or other specification made to a lobbyist or foreign agent by a Member, officer or employee, that effectively prevents a Member from recommending, that is, participating, in a charity to the extent that you would ask someone to give? For example, Senator Pryor's event, which is the David Pryor Invitational, whatever you call it--I have been there--he would not be able, under the Senator's amendment, to recommend to a lobbyist to give to that, would he?
Said by
John Johnston
Democratic · Louisiana

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a proposed amendment on charitable contributions during Senate debate.

Share

More from John Johnston

May 4, 1994

It would sure make it a lot more expensive to do things that are ordinary parts of being a Senator as far as I am concerned.

govinfo.gov
May 5, 1994

The Senator just mentioned our bill allows for unlimited and undisclosed meals, et cetera, and listed four things dealing with meals, tickets and gifts.

govinfo.gov
May 4, 1994

So in effect, any involvement with charities by Senators, whether it is sponsoring a charity, whether it is being the honoree of the charity, whether it is using your name on the stationery, or being on a sponsoring committee, All of that…

govinfo.gov
May 5, 1994

Is it not a fact that the Levin-Wellstone amendment allows the same thing, only while ours would be limited to $75, yours is unlimited, provided it is motivated by personal friendship, to be decided by the Member?

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation