Political Quotes

John Johnston: “So in effect, any involvement with charities by Senators, whether it is sponsoring a charity, whether it is being the…”

On the recordMay 4, 1994
So in effect, any involvement with charities by Senators, whether it is sponsoring a charity, whether it is being the honoree of the charity, whether it is using your name on the stationery, or being on a sponsoring committee, All of that would indirectly be a sponsorship or a recommendation, and if lobbyists were invited, you could be hauled up before the Ethics Committee, I would think, on the basis of that; do you not agree? My first reaction is that, as a practical matter, any effort to help those less fortunate would be problematic and could well be ruled impermissible.
Said by
John Johnston
Democratic · Louisiana

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of Senators' involvement with charities during a debate.

Share

More from John Johnston

May 5, 1994

All I am saying, I think that is entirely correct, and ours allows that. The difference is ours is limited to $75, yours is unlimited, except yours is close personal friend. All I am saying is that the Senator from Minnesota, in quavering…

govinfo.gov
May 4, 1994

Under the Senator's amendment, would he not agree with me that rather than to have three interpretative rulings on--I forget what it was the Senator said; three rulings for events? Would you really have to have an interpretative ruling on…

govinfo.gov
May 4, 1994

Yes. When you go to, say, the Opera Ball, I do not know what one of these dinners down here will cost. You go down at the hotel. I do not feel like I am really being entertained. I feel like I am doing when I go to those things at the…

govinfo.gov
May 4, 1994

Under section a(1), it provides that no Member or spouse may knowingly accept a gift provided directly or indirectly by lobbyists. And it goes on to say in subsection (c), that the following items are subject to the restrictions as…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation