I did not. I said this is vague; we do not know what the number is. And I do not want a number. I do not want the amendment. I am just illustrating how difficult this amendment is to comply with. It is a nightmare.
Discussing the challenges of complying with a specific amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from John Johnston
Let me ask the Senator, if what you say is true that 99.999 percent of the people in the country think ``these trips,'' you have in mind some trips other than what I have in mind----
I rise in strong support of the bill and in opposition, reluctant opposition, to the amendment of my friend from Wyoming. As I said this morning, his point, which is that the National Park Service is underfunded at this time, is a very…
these amendments are as follows: First of all, there are boundary modifications as follows: We delete the Great Falls Wilderness designation and retain that area in wilderness study status. The second amendment modifies the boundaries of…
The actual wording is not that the trip is not substantially recreational, but that the activities as part of the trip are not substantially recreational, which I think is a significant difference because you can have a serious trip that…
Other voices in this conversation
