The actual wording is not that the trip is not substantially recreational, but that the activities as part of the trip are not substantially recreational, which I think is a significant difference because you can have a serious trip that has substantial recreational activities connected with it, and it would be prohibited, which is simply to point out the difficulty of trying to define these things without setting a lot of traps for Senators.
Discussing the definition of recreational activities in relation to a trip.
Share
More from John Johnston
Do you say you should not go to the symphony ball, ambassador ball, National Guard, the opera ball, what have you?
this amendment adds a new title at the end of S. 21. The amendment incorporates the text of a bill which has been reported out of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee overwhelmingly and awaits passage here. I know of no objection to…
Well, that is, ``Anything provided.'' The phrase ``anything provided'' does not sound like a bequest to me. The Senator may be right. He may be right. And I must tell you that bequests from a lobbyist are not my principal concern with this…
I ask the Senator a second question and maybe even a more salient question which is, as a businessman if the Senator from Utah was in the position of the Catellus Corp., keeping in mind they would have this ability to veto this national…
Other voices in this conversation
