these amendments are as follows: First of all, there are boundary modifications as follows: We delete the Great Falls Wilderness designation and retain that area in wilderness study status. The second amendment modifies the boundaries of the Owens Peak Wilderness to delete 580 acres. The third amendment modifies the boundaries of the Santa Rosa Wilderness to delete 320 acres. The fourth amendment retains the portions of the Owlshead and Avawatz areas in wilderness study status. The fifth amendment modifies the boundaries of the Mojave National Park Wilderness to delete 16 acres for an access road. The sixth amendment deletes the Cady Mountains Wilderness designation and retains that area in a wilderness study status. The seventh amendment clarifies that grazing shall be allowed to continue within the Mojave National Park. The eighth amendment clarifies that grazing shall be allowed to continue within the areas added to the Death Valley National Park. The ninth amendment establishes the Mojave National Park Advisory Commission. The 10th amendment provides and clarifies that the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the U.S. Customs Service, and State and local law enforcement activities may continue within the Coyote, the Fish Creek Mountains, and the Jacumba Wilderness areas.
John Johnston: “these amendments are as follows: First of all, there are boundary modifications as follows: We delete the Great Falls…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to wilderness designations and land management.
Share
More from John Johnston
with respect to the statement that the Secretary of the Interior, Mr. Babbitt, was described as making to the effect that if they do not sell to us at the price we want, then we will let them remain in inholding forever, the context of the…
Under section a(1), it provides that no Member or spouse may knowingly accept a gift provided directly or indirectly by lobbyists. And it goes on to say in subsection (c), that the following items are subject to the restrictions as…
It is my understanding of S. 1935 that it will be practically impossible for Members to make an effort, either directly or indirectly, to assist worthwhile causes--that is, tax-exempt, charitable entities.
Well, that is, ``Anything provided.'' The phrase ``anything provided'' does not sound like a bequest to me. The Senator may be right. He may be right. And I must tell you that bequests from a lobbyist are not my principal concern with this…





