with respect to the statement that the Secretary of the Interior, Mr. Babbitt, was described as making to the effect that if they do not sell to us at the price we want, then we will let them remain in inholding forever, the context of the statement--and the statement, as I understand it, was in questioning before the committee. Mr. Babbitt was asked whether or not the Catellus Corp., which owns about 300,000 acres within the areas designated by S. 21, would be likely to accept a land exchange with the Department of the Interior which would give Catellus some other good land which they could use. And I think what the Secretary said, and what he meant, was that they were likely to accept a fair deal because as an inholder they were not likely to be able to use that land as well as they could the land for which they would exchange for, in other words, lands outside the park. The key here is that Catellus is now an inholder within the BLM lands. If this bill passes they would be an inholder in national park land, still surrounded on all sides by Federal property. So if they wanted to build a subdivision and build a road to the subdivision, then they could be frustrated in that demand by the fact that they are a BLM inholder just as surely as if they were a national park inholder. There was no intent of the Secretary of the Interior to, in effect, be abusive in this power of acquisition.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a statement by the Secretary of the Interior regarding land exchanges with Catellus Corp.
Share
More from John Johnston
this amendment adds a new title at the end of S. 21. The amendment incorporates the text of a bill which has been reported out of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee overwhelmingly and awaits passage here. I know of no objection to…
I wish to again commend Senator Bumpers' for his years of hard work on this important legislation. As the subcommittee chairman, he has drafted this legislation, conducted the hearings, and negotiated the compromise that we are passing…
I believe I have made the point I wanted to make, which was disclosure is the key. I do not doubt that there are some things I would not touch with a 10-foot pole and go to. I have not been on a ski trip, not because I think it is evil or…
It would sure make it a lot more expensive to do things that are ordinary parts of being a Senator as far as I am concerned.





