On the recordApril 16, 1997
I hesitate to speak out on this legislation, but having been the only dissenter in the committee I feel compelled to explain my vote. I am confident this bill will neither destroy Western civilization nor save it. However, it does nothing to help it. What we have here is another problem, another law and another form to fill out, and all along I thought our new mandate was to reduce government rules and regulations. Every time Congress passes a new law to solve some problem, several new unsuspected consequences emerge, requiring even more problem solving regulations. This new piece of regulatory law, I am sure, will do the same. This bill will limit consumer choice, raise costs on consumers and limit availability of consumers to purchase a home. Just this past weekend, Alan Greenspan explained why consumers are often better served by private market regulations rather than government intervention. He said that, quote: Government regulation can undermine the effectiveness of private market regulation and can itself be ineffective in protecting the public interest. With this I concur. If Congress were really serious about making it easier for first-time home buyers and others to secure financing, it would do what it could do to lower the cost of capital. Interest rates are high because of the lack of sound monetary and fiscal policies pursued by our government. What should we do? We should cut taxes. We should cut spending.
Source
govinfo.gov




