This provision takes the transgressions outlined in Section 1013 and makes it retroactive, violating the privacy of those who have interacted with these agencies prior to the would-be enactment of H.R. 1.
Davis argues that the amendment violates privacy rights by retroactively applying to past interactions.
Share
More from Rae Oliver Davis
We believe strongly that the protecting of our judiciary is the protection of our democracy.
The guidance from the Attorney General of the United States was to protect the Supreme Court justices' lives and that of their family while at their residence.
As of now, we are in complete compliance, we believe in the Executive Order with regard to private prisons.
Other voices in this conversation
