That was under indictment, in fact pled guilty in Philadelphia. So if that company or any other company could qualify under the conditions that we set down, sure. But I have got a feeling, as far as I am concerned, that the standards would prohibit that. The Young bill, that would not prohibit firms who are criminally convicted of violating existing guidelines from continuing to provide private security. The parent company in Britain has just been found to have committed very, very serious breaches of security in Heathrow Airport. So you have a foreign-owned firm which is on both sides of the ocean failing, and your bill would not prohibit that firm from bidding.
Hal Rogers: “That was under indictment, in fact pled guilty in Philadelphia. So if that company or any other company could qualify…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Young bill on security firms with criminal convictions.
Share
More from Hal Rogers
We have had a so-called skinny budget application, which would not even keep the military up with inflation.
I do work closely with Members of Congress. In my own case to bring my--I did work closely with Members of Congress in my own case, Senator Rand Paul and especially my beloved senator, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and your colleague…
I claim time in support of the amendments, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. This amendments en bloc contains a number of good proposals by both sides of the aisle. I want to highlight just a few. It includes language offered…
I thank the chairwoman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, as chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, I rise in support of the appropriations act that we are considering today. The fiscal situation facing…





