let me explain simply what the gentlewoman's amendment does. The 1995 appropriations act out of our subcommittee included $265 million for the National Institute of Standards and Technology's internal laboratory research programs. That amount was $40 million over the fiscal 1994 figure, an 18 percent increase, and deservedly so, because these labs do a wonderful job. The committee rescission in this bill that is pending before us would rescind $19.5 million from that amount and reduce the 1995 figure to $245.5 million for fiscal 1995. That is still a 9.5 percent increase over the 1994 level, even after the rescission is taken. The NIST internal program will not lose money. They will just simply get as much of an increase as the 1995 bill had given them. They will still be able to employ more people, even with this rescission. The gentlewoman from Maryland has made a very powerful case to this gentleman and the gentleman from West Virginia [Mr. Mollohan], the ranking minority member on our subcommittee, of the importance of the NIST program over and again to us. I have to compliment the gentlewoman from Maryland [Mrs. Morella] for her tremendous persuasiveness about the effectiveness of NIST and its programs. She has convinced us that it would be wise to cut back on the rescission in a fairly modest way but a significant way.
On the recordMarch 15, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of a rescission on funding for the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Share
More from Hal Rogers
May 22, 2023
It's time for resolute action by our government to bring these children home.
Jul 28, 2021
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Pursuant to…
Jan 11, 2022
I would like to thank you for your consideration of my priorities for the 2022 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA).
Dec 14, 2021
I yield to the gentleman from Kentucky, my close friend, whose district was the hardest hit and whose constituents along with all those impacted are in our prayers.





