Again, I wish we had, Madam Speaker, the bill that funds the entire Department of Homeland Security before us instead of this piecemeal approach. I don't fathom why the majority will not bring forth that bill that's been marked up since 47 days ago--6 weeks--and yet they refuse to bring it out. Instead, they bring this piecemeal bill out there that only deals with a particular aspect of the entire Homeland Security bill. And, number two, as I've said before, even if we pass this bill here, it still has to go back to the Senate before it can become law, and they're gone until the middle of September. And this bill won't spend any money until next year anyway. So that's why I say why are we doing it this way? Why can't we just bring out the bill and deal with it? It includes all of this as well. And yet the majority refuses to do that. It's all about politics, Madam Speaker. We are all concerned about that border, about the crime that is taking place, about the illicit drugs coming across, illegal people coming across.
Hal Rogers: “Again, I wish we had, Madam Speaker, the bill that funds the entire Department of Homeland Security before us instead of…”
On the recordAugust 10, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker criticizes the piecemeal approach to funding the Department of Homeland Security.
Share
More from Hal Rogers
May 22, 2023
I do work closely with Members of Congress. In my own case to bring my--I did work closely with Members of Congress in my own case, Senator Rand Paul and especially my beloved senator, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and your colleague…
Jul 28, 2021
I urge a ``no'' vote on the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Jul 28, 2021
I claim time in support of the amendments, and I yield myself such time as I may consume. This amendments en bloc contains a number of good proposals by both sides of the aisle. I want to highlight just a few. It includes language offered…





