That's objection number one. We did not have a chance to have a say-so on this bill. The American people have been shut out of a discussion of what's in this bill, until today. Number two, this bill is loaded down with matters that are not related to helping the brave men and women on the battlefield on the other side. Now, there are all sorts of amendments that you're hearing today that will be offered, one of which contains a lot of spending and a lot of spending that's not related to helping the troops overseas. And so I am disappointed. I'm disappointed in the fact that the Appropriations Committee was bypassed, therefore the people were denied a voice, and this bill brought directly to the floor without ever having had a single day of hearings in the subcommittees and the full committee. I urge a ``no'' vote.
Hal Rogers: “That's objection number one. We did not have a chance to have a say-so on this bill. The American people have been shut…”
On the recordMay 15, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a bill related to military funding and expressing concerns about the legislative process.
Share
More from Hal Rogers
Jan 11, 2022
I request that language be included in this year's WRDA to prohibit a water reallocation study to be conducted at Wolf Creek Dam.
May 22, 2023
I do work closely with Members of Congress. In my own case to bring my--I did work closely with Members of Congress in my own case, Senator Rand Paul and especially my beloved senator, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and your colleague…
Oct 25, 2023
When our Founding Fathers chose a bold, new, and innovative self-rule government, it was met with deep skepticism by the world's monarchs. They said self-rule is only a dream. Our Founders said they are right; it is the American Dream. Now…





