Mr. Chairman, I am in opposition, of course, to the amendment; and I will insist upon the point of order. But before doing so, let me correct a couple of pieces of information. Like all other State and local law enforcement grant programs, COPS in this bill is funded at the same level as the fiscal year 2000 bill was. Our bill provides $745 million, of which $595 million is direct appropriations, the same level as fiscal year 2000, and $150 million is unobligated balances. That level continues to fund the existing COPS programs, including $385 million for hiring cops and $360 million for continuation of the successful nonhiring technology and crime prevention programs. Our hiring number is within $30 million of the Administration's request after funding for all of the unauthorized and relaxed hiring provisions are withdrawn. We continue successful nonhiring programs such as bulletproof vests, COPS technologies and Crime Identification Technology Act grants, that is CITA, that is for DNA testing and the like, police courts and the methamphetamine cleanup program which is so important to so many Members of this body. Funding is not included, however, for new unauthorized and unproven programs, but COPS is funded at the same level as this year.
Hal Rogers: “Mr. Chairman, I am in opposition, of course, to the amendment; and I will insist upon the point of order. But before…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing funding levels for law enforcement grant programs during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Hal Rogers
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question are postponed. Amendments En…
My words were not acceptable. And I expressed my regret to her first and foremost.
When our Founding Fathers chose a bold, new, and innovative self-rule government, it was met with deep skepticism by the world's monarchs. They said self-rule is only a dream. Our Founders said they are right; it is the American Dream. Now…
I urge a ``no'' vote on the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.





