On the recordOctober 6, 2015
In July, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the Michigan Case that the EPA had acted unreasonably and beyond its scope of authority on Utility MACT by not considering cost.
Source
congress.govIn July, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the Michigan Case that the EPA had acted unreasonably and beyond its scope of authority on Utility MACT by not considering cost.
Whitfield discusses a Supreme Court ruling against EPA regulations.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
The third goal of the RFS is to boost rural economies, and here we can say that the program has delivered on its promise.
The RFS was also supposed to provide a means for significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but a growing number of scientists and environmental advocates are saying otherwise.
As I see it, the RFS was enacted largely for three reasons--to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and to strengthen rural economies.