It is impossible today in today's climate to discuss anything relating to tobacco without discussing the political correctness of the issue, and I think that all of us would agree with that, and I do not think there is anybody in this Chamber, or anybody that I know of, that wants young people to smoke any tobacco product, and every tobacco product today has on the package that it may be dangerous to one's health to smoke the product or to chew the product, and we all know that, and all of us know that there are many things in our society that it is harmful for us to engage in. Many things: drinking alcoholic beverages, drinking and driving, dropping out of school. But we also know that individuals make individual choices about what they do, and the same thing takes place on this issue of tobacco. We know historically that prohibition did not work in the alcohol business, we know that it is illegal to sell and buy cocaine and heroin on the streets of America, and yet we know that it is done all over the streets of America, and we know that organized crime is involved in the selling of those products. But one thing that we also know is that tobacco is a legal product, and it is a regulated product.
Ed Whitfield: “It is impossible today in today's climate to discuss anything relating to tobacco without discussing the political…”
On the recordJune 12, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the complexities of tobacco regulation and individual choice.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
Jul 5, 2016
I want clean air. I want clean water. But I don't want an organized attack on the energy-producing sector of America because of, to use Mr. McNerney's term, a political decision to go after hydrocarbons.
May 25, 2016
The main objection here and the basis of the motion to commit relates to climate change. Contrary to the gentleman's statement that the House does not recognize climate change, all of us recognize that the climate is changing. We do…
Jul 5, 2016
So many critics say that that flexibility argument--we're giving maximum flexibility to the State--is really a red herring.





