I want to just read from the Shays-Meehan language. Their language says, ``. . . words that, in context, have no reasonable meaning other than to urge the election or defeat of one or more clearly identified candidates.'' Those are two clearly identified candidates. I think reasonable men and women could have a difference of opinion as to whether or not this is urging the election or defeat of a candidate. Many of these scorecards can. I think the gentleman would agree with me that that could be interpreted to mean you cannot issue these during campaigns. Would the gentleman agree with that?
Ed Whitfield: “I want to just read from the Shays-Meehan language. Their language says, ``. . . words that, in context, have no…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of campaign language in relation to the Shays-Meehan legislation.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
Nuclear energy is, and will continue to be an integral piece of our electricity portfolio.
We have no further speakers on our side of the aisle except for myself, and I think I have the right to close. I don't know if the gentleman from Illinois has additional speakers or if he would like to go at this time.
EPA is pushing a back door cap-and-trade policy without congressional approval.
The main objection here and the basis of the motion to commit relates to climate change. Contrary to the gentleman's statement that the House does not recognize climate change, all of us recognize that the climate is changing. We do…





