Finally, after 16 years, this Congress has passed a tax reduction for the American taxpayers. Listening to the debate on who will benefit from the proposed tax reduction, one would think that the President's plan and the congressional plan were the exact opposite from each other. The truth of the matter is that these bills are quite similar. There are two basic differences in the legislation. First of all, the congressional tax reduction package does more for small businessmen and women than the President's. Two out of every three jobs created in America today are created by small business owners. They need tax incentives for economic expansion, not tax obstacles. The President wants to expand the only refundable tax credit in the Tax Code, the earned income credit. These are the two basic differences in the legislation. Let us stop politicizing this issue and reduce the tax burden of the American people.
Ed Whitfield: “Finally, after 16 years, this Congress has passed a tax reduction for the American taxpayers. Listening to the debate on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the passage of a tax reduction bill and its implications for small businesses.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
The main objection here and the basis of the motion to commit relates to climate change. Contrary to the gentleman's statement that the House does not recognize climate change, all of us recognize that the climate is changing. We do…
In my view, an appliance that saves a few dollars per year on energy but doesn't work as well is being penny wise and pound foolish.
The RFS was also supposed to provide a means for significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but a growing number of scientists and environmental advocates are saying otherwise.
If that happens and if you're still at the EPA I want you to go to Fairfield, Texas with Congressman Bill Flores and explain to those people who've lost their jobs how you've improved their environment.





