We believe Congressman Whitfield's proposed legislation is based more on perception than on sound science.
Ed Whitfield: “We believe Congressman Whitfield's proposed legislation is based more on perception than on sound science.”
Editor's note · Context
Criticism of legislation perceived as excessive and damaging to the horse industry.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
If that happens and if you're still at the EPA I want you to go to Fairfield, Texas with Congressman Bill Flores and explain to those people who've lost their jobs how you've improved their environment.
As I see it, the RFS was enacted largely for three reasons--to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and to strengthen rural economies.
In order to reach Congress' statutory volumes there needs to be more ethanol in the system than can be absorbed just through E10.
This subcommittee has cast a critical eye on several major regulations--such as the ozone rule and the Clean Power Plan--that threaten billions of dollars in costs and thousands of jobs.





