On the recordSeptember 7, 2011
I think there are some legitimate concerns here about cost-benefit analysis and particularly when you have said yourself since you have been at EPA, the costs have never exceeded the benefits.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Whitfield questions the validity of EPA's cost-benefit analysis regarding health regulations.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
Jun 21, 2016
As I see it, the RFS was enacted largely for three reasons--to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and to strengthen rural economies.
Jun 9, 2016
This subcommittee has cast a critical eye on several major regulations--such as the ozone rule and the Clean Power Plan--that threaten billions of dollars in costs and thousands of jobs.
Jun 9, 2016
In my view, an appliance that saves a few dollars per year on energy but doesn't work as well is being penny wise and pound foolish.
Jul 5, 2016
27 States filed a lawsuit against the Clean Power Plan, and the Supreme Court issued a stay.
Other voices in this conversation
