Simply stated, if the EPA wants to upend the world's greatest power system by forcing a round peg into the square hole that is Section 111(d), it should have the prudence to allow the final rule to be reviewed by the courts before requiring states to undertake such a profound effort.
Ed Whitfield: “Simply stated, if the EPA wants to upend the world's greatest power system by forcing a round peg into the square hole…”
Editor's note · Context
Whitfield criticizes the EPA for rushing regulatory changes without judicial review.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
To our friends on the other side of the aisle, I want to thank them for working with us on this legislation. I know it is difficult to please everyone. Any time you talk about energy today, of course, people raise the issue of climate…
However, most of this trend is due to sharply increased domestic oil production--something that few imagined was even possible during the Congressional debates over the RFS.
We must do more to decrease our dependence on foreign oil and expand our use of renewable energy sources that boost economic development in our rural areas...
Despite the stay of the Clean Power Plan, last week EPA published a 44-page proposed rule setting forth the details for Clean Energy Incentive Program.





