What I object to is that the EPA would use that and mandate that private industry build that technology here in the U.S. And I think that your amendment would allow them to do that, and that is what I object to. I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
So many critics say that that flexibility argument--we're giving maximum flexibility to the State--is really a red herring.
In my view, an appliance that saves a few dollars per year on energy but doesn't work as well is being penny wise and pound foolish.
It is critically important that the Federal Government maintains its leadership role of promoting, encouraging, and enticing interested stakeholders.
Other voices in this conversation
