I would remind everyone just once again that we're talking about 14 regulations. We're not delaying 12 of them in any way. We're asking for further analysis of two of them. For that reason, I would oppose the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Capps). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
My bill, the Renewable Fuel Utilization, Expansion, and Leadership Act, or REFUEL, will create a new and retrofit existing infrastructure including pumps for biofuels and hydrogen tanks, piping, and electric vehicle chargers...
In my view, an appliance that saves a few dollars per year on energy but doesn't work as well is being penny wise and pound foolish.
It is critically important that the Federal Government maintains its leadership role of promoting, encouraging, and enticing interested stakeholders.
Cumbersome red tape in our regulatory process forces ratepayers to pay more for safe, clean nuclear power.
Other voices in this conversation
