Yesterday I read an article by Speaker Pelosi in which she said the health care bill they proposed would strengthen Medicare, reduce deficits, and bring the predatory practices of health insurance companies under control. How can you strengthen Medicare when you take $500 billion out of it, out of nursing homes, out of hospitals, and out of Medicare advantage? How do you claim you reduce the deficit by $138 billion when you include the taxes for 10 years and the expenditures for only 6 years? And how do you say you are going to control the insurance companies, and act like you are throwing them in the briar patch, when in fact they support this bill? They went to the White House and helped write this bill. Why? Because this bill requires small businesses and individuals to buy health insurance, and, if not, they will be subject to civil penalties. Health reform may be necessary, but this bill is the wrong bill.
Editor's note · Context
Whitfield critiques the health care bill proposed by Speaker Pelosi, questioning its impact on Medicare and deficits.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
There are strong feelings on the issue because many people, and we are speaking for our constituents, believe that EPA is exceeding its legal authority under the direction of a president who is trying to impose his will on climate change…
The main objection here and the basis of the motion to commit relates to climate change. Contrary to the gentleman's statement that the House does not recognize climate change, all of us recognize that the climate is changing. We do…
We must do more to decrease our dependence on foreign oil and expand our use of renewable energy sources that boost economic development in our rural areas...
In order to reach Congress' statutory volumes there needs to be more ethanol in the system than can be absorbed just through E10.





