On the recordJune 28, 2012
That was sold on the basis that mercury emissions were going to be the primary benefit.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Whitfield argues that the Utility MACT was misrepresented regarding its benefits.
Share & report
More from Ed Whitfield
Jun 8, 2016
Mr. Chairman, H.R. 4775, as I said, requires the EPA to develop two studies and reports to submit to Congress. I talked about that in my closing statement. My amendment is relating to those studies. The first is a study of the impacts of…
May 25, 2016
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Walden), who is a member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and is quite familiar with energy issues.
Jun 9, 2016
It is critically important that the Federal Government maintains its leadership role of promoting, encouraging, and enticing interested stakeholders.
Apr 13, 2016
This practical bill simply ensures that air quality continues to improve while avoiding unnecessary harm to State and local governments and to job-creating businesses.
Other voices in this conversation
