the agency is inclined to overstate both the extent and the certainty of the benefits, while downplaying the costs.
Ed Whitfield: “the agency is inclined to overstate both the extent and the certainty of the benefits, while downplaying the costs.”
Editor's note · Context
Whitfield criticizes the EPA for overstating benefits and ignoring costs of proposed ozone regulations.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
It is critically important that the Federal Government maintains its leadership role of promoting, encouraging, and enticing interested stakeholders.
EPA is pushing a back door cap-and-trade policy without congressional approval.
As I see it, the RFS was enacted largely for three reasons--to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, to lower greenhouse gas emissions, and to strengthen rural economies.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill, add the following new section: SEC. 5. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED. No…





