On the recordMay 22, 2011
I would much rather keep that 2 to 3.9 billion dollars in the pockets of our constituents in the Midwest rather than giving it to our close friends, our deeply held friends in Canada.
Source
congress.govI would much rather keep that 2 to 3.9 billion dollars in the pockets of our constituents in the Midwest rather than giving it to our close friends, our deeply held friends in Canada.
Whitfield emphasizes prioritizing Midwest financial benefits over Canadian profits from the Keystone pipeline.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
Well, some States would disagree with that. I've talked to many of them, and they view--even though you went through a process, that you set the standard.
So many critics say that that flexibility argument--we're giving maximum flexibility to the State--is really a red herring.
I want clean air. I want clean water. But I don't want an organized attack on the energy-producing sector of America because of, to use Mr. McNerney's term, a political decision to go after hydrocarbons.