Political Quotes

On the recordOctober 6, 2011
A number of speakers on the other side have indicated that, if our legislation passes, new regulations relating to Boiler MACT would be put off indefinitely. I would like to clarify and point out that, in section 3 on page 6 of this bill, it says: For each regulation promulgated pursuant to this legislation, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall--not ``may''--shall establish a date for compliance. So this is not being put off indefinitely. It explicitly says ``shall.'' Now, during the hearings that we've had, extensive hearings on this Boiler MACT that was adopted by the EPA in 2004, which was invalidated by the courts because of lawsuits filed by environmental groups, the typical testimony was this: EPA final rules impose unrealistic and very costly requirements that EPA has not justified by corresponding environmental and health protection from reductions of hazardous air pollutants. Just as a practical example of what I'm talking about, many universities, in order to comply with that 2004 rule, spent large sums of money. The University of Notre Dame spent $20 million to comply with that rule, which has now been invalidated, and EPA has come out with an even more stringent rule that's going to cause a lot more money to be spent. {time} 1240 So we genuinely believe that EPA has the health standards in effect that will protect our children. There's nothing in this bill that's going to change any of that.…
Said by
Ed Whitfield
Republican · Kentucky

Share & report

More from Ed Whitfield

Mar 14, 2016

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and to insert extraneous materials in the Record on the bill. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the…

Congressional Record · 2016-03-14
May 25, 2016

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 744, I call up the bill (S. 2012) to provide for the modernization of the energy policy of the United States, and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the…

Congressional Record · 2016-05-25
Apr 13, 2016

And so we have a real problem and one comment I would make about Mr. Olson's legislation is some have suggested that we are mandating that only--it be reviewed every 10 years.

congress.gov
May 25, 2016

Mr. Speaker, the main objection here and the basis of the motion to commit relates to climate change. Contrary to the gentleman's statement that the House does not recognize climate change, all of us recognize that the climate is changing…

Congressional Record · 2016-05-25

Other voices in this conversation