Isn't it true that the State Department's own Environmental Impact Statement included review of an alternative not to build the pipeline at all and didn't the Environmental Impact Statement conclude that building the pipeline along the preferred route was better environmentally than no pipeline at all?
Whitfield questions the State Department's Environmental Impact Statement regarding pipeline alternatives.
Share & report
More from Ed Whitfield
It is critically important that the Federal Government maintains its leadership role of promoting, encouraging, and enticing interested stakeholders.
This subcommittee has cast a critical eye on several major regulations--such as the ozone rule and the Clean Power Plan--that threaten billions of dollars in costs and thousands of jobs.
Nuclear energy is, and will continue to be an integral piece of our electricity portfolio.
These new technologies and life-saving medical treatments are critical to develop and deploy at a timely pace.
Other voices in this conversation
