Isn't it true that the State Department's own Environmental Impact Statement included review of an alternative not to build the pipeline at all and didn't the Environmental Impact Statement conclude that building the pipeline along the preferred route was better environmentally than no pipeline at all?
On the recordJanuary 24, 2012
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Whitfield questions the State Department's Environmental Impact Statement regarding pipeline alternatives.
Share
More from Ed Whitfield
Jun 21, 2016
there is an immense loss of wildlife habitat where because of the incentives that Congress has passed...
Jun 8, 2016
We all have a great deal of respect for the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Polis) and know that he focuses on these particular issues and is quite familiar with them. The reason that we are opposing this amendment is that his amendment would…
May 25, 2016
The main objection here and the basis of the motion to commit relates to climate change. Contrary to the gentleman's statement that the House does not recognize climate change, all of us recognize that the climate is changing. We do…





